urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

response; thoughts about inline and tags

master
http://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/ 2010-04-01 00:23:31 +00:00 committed by Joey Hess
parent 4dcea6207d
commit 4eed0abc8c
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn
View File

@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ lead to making inline too big, though.
>> for inlining with archive=yes (for which I now realise "inline"
>> is the wrong verb anyway :-) ) --s
>>> I think *inline* would be a bit less unwieldy if there was some way of factoring out the feed stuff into a separate plugin, but I don't know if that's possible. --K.A.
Is the intention that the `trail` part is a performance hack, or a way
to select pages? How does it relate to [[todo/wikitrails]] or
[[plugins/contrib/trail]]? --[[smcv]]
@ -54,3 +56,7 @@ to select pages? How does it relate to [[todo/wikitrails]] or
>> does provide a neat way for it to work around having unwanted
>> pages in the report, by limiting by a suitable tag or subdirectory
>> or something. --s
>>> Either that, or somehow combine tagging with fields, such that one could declare a tag, and it would create both a link and a field with a given value. (I've been working on something like that, but it still has bugs).
>>> That way, the test for whether something is tagged would be something like "link(tag/foo) and field(tag foo)".
>>> --K.A.