urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update on state of the darcs plugin

master
pesco 2008-10-11 11:53:25 -04:00 committed by Joey Hess
parent 7ac2b6a6ca
commit 4d368e17c7
1 changed files with 19 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
doc/todo/darcs.mdwn
View File

@ -486,11 +486,11 @@ It's got couple of FIXMEs, and a very site-specific filter for recentchanges. No
---
And here's yet another one. :)
And here's yet another one, including an updated `ikiwiki-makerepo`. :)
<http://khjk.org/~pesco/ikiwiki-darcs/>
<http://khjk.org/~pesco/ikiwiki-darcs/> (now a darcs repo)
I've taken all the good stuff from the above and added the missing hooks. Some of them I haven't had a chance to test, namely `rcs_rename`, `rcs_remove`, `rcs_commit_staged`, and `rcs_diff`. Also, I'm not experienced with perl and don't know where I should have used the function `possibly_foolish_untaint`.
I've taken all the good stuff from the above and added the missing hooks. The code hasn't seen a lot of testing, so some bugs are likely yet to surface. Also, I'm not experienced with perl and don't know where I should have used the function `possibly_foolish_untaint`.
Regarding the repository layout: There are two darcs repositories. One is the `srcdir`, the other we'll call `master`.
@ -523,4 +523,20 @@ Regarding the repository layout: There are two darcs repositories. One is the `s
> * Is the the darcs info in [[details]] still up-to-date re this version?
> --[[Joey]]
> Update:
>
> I think I've addressed all of the above except for the XML parsing in `darcs_info`.
> The function determines the md5 hash of the last patch the given file appears in.
> That's indeed being done with regexps but my Perl isn't good enough for a quick recode
> right now.
>
> As for the darcs info in [[rcs/details]], it does not accurately describe the way
> this version works. It's similar, but the details differ slightly.
> You could copy my description above to replace it.
>
> There is still some ironing to do, for instance the current version doesn't allow for
> modifying attachments by re-uploading them via CGI ("darcs add failed"). Am I assuming
> correctly that "adding" a file that's already in the repo should just be a no-op?
> --pesco
[[!tag patch]]