urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added a comment

master
jon+ikiwiki@663db4cb26e845748f3e7e6d51eeb26c6014f1c3 2018-02-22 12:30:42 -04:00 committed by admin
parent 8389b154b8
commit 4d355918f0
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
doc/forum/Some_thoughts_about_Ikiwiki/comment_1_db32786dd1c1022cec983a12a30b2b17._comment 100644
View File

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="jon+ikiwiki@663db4cb26e845748f3e7e6d51eeb26c6014f1c3"
nickname="jon+ikiwiki"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/2a3bcb34947fceef61560bd8a2931957"
subject="comment 1"
date="2018-02-22T16:30:42Z"
content="""
I have basically been on a similar journey recently. Honestly I would like to move on from IkiWiki myself, and I agree with most of your first points (except the OOP one, which I think is a red herring). I haven't done a deep evaluation of other static site generators, just a shallow one; but I haven't looked at only Python. But results across other languages are much the same. A few core concepts in IkiWiki are very *right*, IMHO: the pagespec/wikilink rules amongst them. -- [[Jon]]
"""]]