urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

single-indent (not sure why I doubled it)

master
Jonathan Dowland 2021-08-18 11:54:59 +01:00
parent 6f01444de6
commit 4a67f6130f
1 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

40
doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn
View File

@ -16,23 +16,23 @@ Any chances of it being merged into master? At this point I am considering if it
--[[Tina]] --[[Tina]]
>> Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for > Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for
>> review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are > review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are
>> overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can > overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can
>> do to help? > do to help?
>> >
>> In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1) > In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1)
>> into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated > into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated
>> Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]]. > Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]].
>> >
>> The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house" > The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house"
>> for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to > for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to
>> get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence > get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence
>> in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of > in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of
>> course. > course.
>> >
>> I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after > I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after
>> you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR > you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR
>> against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest. > against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest.
>> >
>> -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18* > -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18*