urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

single-indent (not sure why I doubled it)

master
Jonathan Dowland 2021-08-18 11:54:59 +01:00
parent 6f01444de6
commit 4a67f6130f
1 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

40
doc/todo/merge_tina-osm_branch.mdwn
View File

@ -16,23 +16,23 @@ Any chances of it being merged into master? At this point I am considering if it
--[[Tina]]
>> Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for
>> review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are
>> overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can
>> do to help?
>>
>> In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1)
>> into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated
>> Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]].
>>
>> The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house"
>> for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to
>> get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence
>> in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of
>> course.
>>
>> I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after
>> you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR
>> against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest.
>>
>> -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18*
> Hi, I can understand your frustration with having outstanding patches for
> review/merge. You aren't alone. It's clear that the IkiWiki maintainers are
> overloaded at the moment. IkiWiki maintainers, is there anything that we can
> do to help?
>
> In my case I started [collecting together stuff that I was requesting be merged](https://github.com/jmtd/ikiwiki/compare/3.20200202.3...jmtd:opinionated?expand=1)
> into IkiWiki, by myself and others, in a branch that I use for the *Opinionated
> Ikiwiki* [[container|containers]].
>
> The *Opinionated IkiWiki* container was not intended to be a "clearing house"
> for patches, as such, but it could potentially be a way for pending stuff to
> get some exposure, which might increase the overburdened maintainers confidence
> in the patches. (Would it)? Supposing that anyone is using the container of
> course.
>
> I've personally not used the OSM plugin at all, but I took a quick look after
> you posted the above message. It looks cool! I would probably accept a PR
> against the "opinionated" branch in my fork, above, if that was of any interest.
>
> -- *[[Jon]], 2021-08-18*