urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Referred to related things.

master
http://lj.rossia.org/users/imz/ 2009-05-16 16:33:14 -04:00 committed by Joey Hess
parent c2d3fa4352
commit 48457b6ce3
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
View File

@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ I like the idea of [[tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki]], and I do so
>
>> I thought about this briefly, and got about that far.. glad you got
>> further. :-) --[[Joey]]
>> Or, one could also refer to the language of [[!wikipedia description logics]]: their formulas actually define classes of objects through quantified relations to other classes. --Ivan Z.
>
> Another option would be go with a more functional syntax. The concept here would
> be to allow a pagespec to appear in a 'pagespec function' anywhere a page can. e.g.
@ -67,13 +69,15 @@ I like the idea of [[tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki]], and I do so
>>>> Yeah, guess that'd work. :-)
> One quick further thought. All the above discussion assumes that 'dependency' is the
> <a id="another_kind_of_links" />One quick further thought. All the above discussion assumes that 'dependency' is the
> same as 'links to', which is not really true. For example, you'd like to be able to say
> "This bug does not depend upon [ [ link to other bug ] ]" and not have a dependency.
> Without having different types of links, I don't see how this would be possible.
>
> -- [[Will]]
>> I saw that this issue is targeted at by the work on [[structured page data#another_kind_of_links]]. --Ivan Z.
Okie - I've had a quick attempt at this. Initial patch attached. This one doesn't quite work.
And there is still a lot of debugging stuff in there.