Further details
parent
0eca0b4dff
commit
447d3ae258
|
@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ At the moment, you go through the login shuffle and then are told that cookies a
|
||||||
> websites that have a login require cookies. Such warnings used to be
|
> websites that have a login require cookies. Such warnings used to be
|
||||||
> common, but few sites bother with them anymore. --[[Joey]]
|
> common, but few sites bother with them anymore. --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>> Very few websites break without cookies. Even fewer lose data.
|
||||||
|
>> Can ikiwiki avoid being below average by default? --[MJR](http://mjr.towers.org.uk)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Even better would be to only display the cookie note as a warning if the login page doesn't receive a session cookie.
|
Even better would be to only display the cookie note as a warning if the login page doesn't receive a session cookie.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> I considered doing this before, but it would require running the cgi once
|
> I considered doing this before, but it would require running the cgi once
|
||||||
|
@ -15,3 +18,5 @@ Best of all would be to use URL-based or hidden-field-based session tokens if co
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> This is not very doable since most of the pages the user browses are
|
> This is not very doable since most of the pages the user browses are
|
||||||
> static pages in a static location.
|
> static pages in a static location.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>> The pages that lose data without cookies (the edit pages, primarily) don't look static. Are they really? --[MJR](http://mjr.towers.org.uk)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue