urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

response

master
Joey Hess 2008-07-25 12:51:50 -04:00
parent 75acf76851
commit 435a8e1ce5
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn
View File

@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ What do you think about that? Does the patch have any side-effects I didn't see?
>> at least I hope so ;-) ): I just created a test post in the sandbox here: [[sandbox/test: with a colon in its name]] >> at least I hope so ;-) ): I just created a test post in the sandbox here: [[sandbox/test: with a colon in its name]]
>> (btw, why doesn't this get a hyperlink here?). >> (btw, why doesn't this get a hyperlink here?).
>> >>
>>> Because wikilinks cannot have spaces, convert to underscores.
>>> --[[Joey]]
>>
>> As it is put in the list of blog posts as a relative link, it starts >> As it is put in the list of blog posts as a relative link, it starts
>> with `<word><colon>` -- this makes the browser think that "test" is a protocol specification which is to replace `http`, >> with `<word><colon>` -- this makes the browser think that "test" is a protocol specification which is to replace `http`,
>> so it complains (at least Opera and Firefox/Iceweasel on my Debian Etch do). What I described above for subpages >> so it complains (at least Opera and Firefox/Iceweasel on my Debian Etch do). What I described above for subpages
@ -69,3 +72,5 @@ What do you think about that? Does the patch have any side-effects I didn't see?
>> >>
>> I think the cleanest solution would be to quote colons in page names (like it is currently done for slashes)? >> I think the cleanest solution would be to quote colons in page names (like it is currently done for slashes)?
>> Starting the links with "`./`", as I proposed above, now seems a bit ugly to me... --Mathias >> Starting the links with "`./`", as I proposed above, now seems a bit ugly to me... --Mathias
>>> No, it's all [[done]] in 2.55. --[[Joey]]