doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn

@@ -69,8 +69,11 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
 >>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there
 >>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten
 >>> to: --[[Joey]] 
+>>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]]
 >>>
 >>> * `rcs_diff` already exists; why add `rcs_showpatch`?
+>>>> If `rcs_diff` is intended for human consumption, by all means we can use that. -- [[peteg]]
+
 >>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and
 >>>   `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but
 >>>   maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the
@@ -79,6 +82,9 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
 >>>   needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running
 >>>   in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need
 >>>   `git show` to run in a subdir at all..
+>>>> I was aping (preserving) what was already there. I don't understand what you say about `git show` - it must run under $srcdir, surely? And empirically the CGI process wasn't in the right place. By all means simplify that. -- [[peteg]]
+
 >>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in.
 >>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and
 >>>   use `IkiWiki::Receive`.
+>>>> Indeed. This is saying that the checking code in IkiWiki::Receive is in the wrong place. I think it would be better to set up some general hooks and shuffle it into a plugin, for then other plugins that maintain special files in the repo can have a say about validity. -- [[peteg]]