master
smcv 2017-06-01 09:48:10 -04:00 committed by admin
parent bbf2d13ae3
commit 2f765597de
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ my [toc-recycle-id branch][] (see [921a264][]).
[921a264]: https://gitlab.com/anarcat/ikiwiki/commit/27d5d9d126b6b675ad273ebd63095df0c921a264 [921a264]: https://gitlab.com/anarcat/ikiwiki/commit/27d5d9d126b6b675ad273ebd63095df0c921a264
[toc-recycle-id branch]: https://gitlab.com/anarcat/ikiwiki/commits/toc-id-recycle [toc-recycle-id branch]: https://gitlab.com/anarcat/ikiwiki/commits/toc-id-recycle
> [[Merged|done]] --[[smcv]]
The second step is to generate those headings. There are two ways of The second step is to generate those headings. There are two ways of
doing this: doing this:
@ -40,7 +42,16 @@ doing this:
> far as I know there's still no API-stable CommonMark library. --[[smcv]] > far as I know there's still no API-stable CommonMark library. --[[smcv]]
> > Sure - but then does discount introduce those identifiers in headings? > > Sure - but then does discount introduce those identifiers in headings?
> >
> > > Only if you ask for a table of contents, which ikiwiki doesn't.
> > > If you want it to have a flag to produce the IDs even without enabling
> > > its built-in ToC support, that would be a feature request for discount,
> > > not ikiwiki. Until/unless it does, there's always headinganchors. --s
> >
> > And what about the patch to recycle those identifiers? --[[anarcat]] > > And what about the patch to recycle those identifiers? --[[anarcat]]
> > >
> > > I already merged it, and added a regression test. Sorry, I forgot
> > > to close this todo at the time. --s
2. enable the [[plugins/headinganchors]] plugin. if multimarkdown is 2. enable the [[plugins/headinganchors]] plugin. if multimarkdown is
disabled, this can also provide usable identifiers. disabled, this can also provide usable identifiers.