urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

branches with low quality

master
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkickHAzX_uVJMd_vFJjae6SLs2G38URPU 2015-02-06 18:37:58 -04:00 committed by admin
parent e539d205e3
commit 2e39b57969
1 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
doc/forum/Appropriate_way_to_share_low_quality_patches.mdwn 100644
View File

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
I've made the following ikiwiki tweaks which now reside in separate branches
of my online git repo.
* Album plugin: Image metadata - Populate album with metadata extracted from
image using Image::ExifTool. Also generate tags and osm waypoint if gps data
is available.
* Album plugin: New albumpreview.tmpl with corresponding changes to album.pm
that creates a thumbnail that links to an album rather than an image. Useful
for creating thumbnailed indexes of albums.
* Img plugin: sharpen images when resampling. (also save interlaced jpg's)
* My kalleswork.net-current branch contains further tweaks, themes and
crazyness that's likely only of interest to me.
These are all of very low quality as I've just hacked about with no knowledge
of the codebase or indeed coding (even less Perl). In spite of this they now
seem to work! They should all be options or have options in the config but
I've not gotten around to figuring that out yet.
I'd like to share them as a prod to someone with actual skills to look at them
if they find the features interesting. I'm hesitant to place my repo in the
[[git]] list and tagging the various feature off with [[templates/gitbranch/]]
because of the pick axe coding going on. Should I do this regardless of quality
or is there a better way to share it?
/[[/users/kjs]]