urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

I think this would be ok to do, but here's something to consider..

master
Joey Hess 2007-11-08 15:11:25 -05:00
parent 6a751b2a83
commit 27501f28fa
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/todo/brokenlinks_should_group_links_to_a_page.mdwn
View File

@ -7,3 +7,13 @@ current behavior, perhaps brokenlinks could have an option to group by link
target.
--[[JoshTriplett]]
> The only downside I see to doing that is that currently it create a
> "?Link" that will create the missing page, with a default location that's
> the same as clicking on the "?Link" in the page with the broken link. But
> if multiple pages are listed on one line, there's only one link and so it
> can only be from=somepage. This would probably not be a problem in most
> cases though. It's likely that if a missing page is linked to from 2+ pages,
> that the user both won't take much care which link is clicked on
> to create it, and that both pages really meant to link to the same page
> anyway. --[[Joey]]