urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.ikiwiki.info into aggregateinternal

master
Simon McVittie 2008-07-12 19:01:56 +01:00
parent 5c0896e674 3f38fab150
commit 23a3de5e8c
1 changed files with 20 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
doc/todo/aggregate_to_internal_pages.mdwn
View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ The new internal page feature is designed for something like
How to transition to it though? inlines of aggregated content would need to How to transition to it though? inlines of aggregated content would need to
change their pagespecs to use `internal()`. change their pagespecs to use `internal()`.
> [[patch]] in git://git.debian.org/git/users/smcv/ikiwiki.git, branch "aggregate"; [see also gitweb](http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/ikiwiki.git;a=commit;h=01d7ae803710bb0d84fc8d172fd98fd57fb77e9d). --smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk > [[patch]] in git://git.debian.org/git/users/smcv/ikiwiki.git, branch "aggregate".
> Migration is a two-step process: first change all your pagespecs to use `internal()`, then add `internalize="yes"` to all your aggregate invocations. --smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk > Migration is a two-step process: first change all your pagespecs to use `internal()`, then add `internalize="yes"` to all your aggregate invocations. --smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk
> Thanks for working on this. > Thanks for working on this.
@ -32,4 +32,23 @@ change their pagespecs to use `internal()`.
> not have to worry about these bugs in the future. So, I'm thinking flag > not have to worry about these bugs in the future. So, I'm thinking flag
> day. --[[Joey]] > day. --[[Joey]]
> OK, there's a simpler approach in the same repository, branch
> "aggregateinternal". It just adds an aggregateinternal option
> for the whole wiki.
>
> On a flag day, everyone has to change their inline directives
> to use `internal()`, after which this option can be switched on.
> When changing the option, you'll have to clean up the mess from
> old aggregated pages by hand, and re-aggregate.
>
> If this is a direction you prefer, the next step would be to
> add support for existing wikis setting this option - for instance
> it could look for non-internal pages that were previously
> aggregated, and convert them to internal, the first time aggregation
> runs. --smcv
> Sure, that seems reasonable. Perhaps `ikiwiki-transition` could be used
> to move the pages, and even, possibly update the pagespecs (not sure how
> it could figure out which ones tho). --[[Joey]]
[[patch]] [[patch]]