urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update on some of the conflict cases

master
Joey Hess 2008-07-21 13:56:58 -04:00
parent 494e7ab8ba
commit 20cae78ac7
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn
View File

@ -407,17 +407,26 @@ Cases that have to be dealt with:
* Alice clicks "delete" button for a page; Bob makes a modification;
Alice confirms deletion. Ideally in this case, Alice should get an error
message that there's a conflict.
Update: In my current code, alice's deletion will fail if the file was
moved or deleted in the meantime; if the file was modified since alice
clicked on the delete button, the modifications will be deleted too. I
think this is acceptable.
* Alice opens edit UI for a page; Bob makes a modification; Alice
clicks delete button and confirms deletion. Again here, Alice should get
a conflict error. Note that this means that the rcstoken should be
recorded when the edit UI is first opened, not when the delete button is
hit.
Update: Again here, there's no conflict, but the delete succeeds. Again,
basically acceptible.
* Alice and Bob both try to delete a page at the same time. It's fine for
the second one to get a message that it no longer exists. Or just to
silently fail to delete the deleted page..
Update: It will display an error to the second one that the page doesn't
exist.
* Alice deletes a page; Bob had edit window open for it, and saves
it afterwards. I think that Bob should win in this case; Alice can always
notice the page has been added back, and delete it again.
Update: Bob wins.
* Alice clicks "rename" button for a page; Bob makes a modification;
Alice confirms rename. This case seems easy, it should just rename the
modified page.