review from the woods
parent
104919ee07
commit
1c8ac7d88c
|
@ -96,3 +96,22 @@ Ordinary [[WikiLinks|ikiwiki/WikiLink]] appear in `%links`, but not in
|
|||
|
||||
An optional third parameter sets the link type (`undef` produces an ordinary
|
||||
[[ikiwiki/WikiLink]]).
|
||||
|
||||
> Some code refers to `oldtypedlinks`, and other to `oldlinktypes`.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> I'm curious what your reasoning was for adding a new variable
|
||||
> rather than using `pagestate`. Was it only because you needed
|
||||
> the `old` version to detect change, or was there other complexity?
|
||||
>
|
||||
> I have not convinced myself this is a real problem, but..
|
||||
> If a page has a typed link, there seems to be no way to tell
|
||||
> if it also has a separate, regular link. `add_link` will add
|
||||
> to `@links` when adding a typed, or untyped link. If only untyped
|
||||
> links were recorded there, one could tell the difference. But then
|
||||
> typed links would not show up at all in eg, a linkmap,
|
||||
> unless it was changed to check for typed links too.
|
||||
> (Or, regular links could be recorded in typedlinks too,
|
||||
> with a empty type. (Bloaty.))
|
||||
>
|
||||
> I suspect we could get away without having `tagged_is_strict`
|
||||
> without too much transitional trouble. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue