removed some cruft from index/discussion, and moved some parger bits out
into individual todo itemsmaster
parent
c9e07b583b
commit
08e9c427a9
|
@ -95,28 +95,7 @@ I just figured I'd edit something on the page with my OpenID, since you've imple
|
|||
|
||||
# ACL
|
||||
|
||||
How about adding ACL? So that you can control which users are allowed
|
||||
to read, write certain pages. The moinmoin wiki has that, and it is
|
||||
something, that I think is very valuable.
|
||||
|
||||
> ikiwiki currently has only the most rudimentary access controls: pages
|
||||
> can be locked, or unlocked and only the admin can edit locked pages. That
|
||||
> could certianly be expanded on, although it's not an area that I have an
|
||||
> overwhelming desire to work on myself right now. Patches appreciated and
|
||||
> I'll be happy to point you in the right directions.. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> I'm really curious how you'd suggest implementing ACLs on reading a page.
|
||||
>> It seems to me the only way you could do it is .htaccess DenyAll or something,
|
||||
>> and then route all page views through ikiwiki.cgi. Am I missing something?
|
||||
>> --[[Ethan]]
|
||||
|
||||
>>> Or you could just use apache or whatever and set up the access controls
|
||||
>>> there. Of course, that wouldn't integrate very well with the wiki,
|
||||
>>> unless perhaps you decided to use http basic authentication and the
|
||||
>>> httpauth plugin for ikiwiki that integrates with that.. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>>>> Which would rule out openid, or other fun forms of auth. And routing all access
|
||||
>>>> through the CGI sort of defeats the purpose of ikiwiki. --[[Ethan]]
|
||||
> Moved to [[todo/ACL]] --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -136,20 +115,7 @@ the template. -- Ethan
|
|||
|
||||
# Canonical feed location?
|
||||
|
||||
Any way to use `inline` but point the feed links to a different feed on the
|
||||
same site? I have news in news/*, a news archive in news.mdwn, and the
|
||||
first few news items on index.mdwn, but I don't really want two separate
|
||||
feeds, one with all news and one with the latest few articles; I'd rather
|
||||
point the RSS feed links of both to the same feed. (Which one, the one
|
||||
with all news or the one with the latest news only, I don't know yet.)
|
||||
|
||||
> Not currently. It could be implemented, or you could just turn off the
|
||||
> rss feed for the index page, and manually put in a wikilink to the news
|
||||
> page and rss feed. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> That wouldn't use the same style for the RSS and Atom links, and it
|
||||
>> wouldn't embed the feed link into `<head>` so that browsers can automatically
|
||||
>> find it.
|
||||
Moved to [[todo/canonical_feed_location]] --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -180,34 +146,6 @@ Any plugins or support for exporting to LaTeX?
|
|||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
# Using with RCS?
|
||||
|
||||
Any examples of using co(1), ci(1) and other RCS related tools with ikiwiki?
|
||||
|
||||
> I don't belive that RCS offers enough SCM features to be useable as a
|
||||
> fullfledged backend to ikiwiki. For one thing, there's no way to have
|
||||
> hook scripts run when changes are ci'd, is there? So you'd have to ci and
|
||||
> then manually run ikiwiki. It should be possible to do an RCS backend
|
||||
> that supports web commits with ci, and history (parsing the rcs files by
|
||||
> hand?). If you're a masochist. :-) --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> It does have history using rlog(1) which is similar format to "cvs log".
|
||||
>> I don't think it has any possible hooks. What would happen if I call
|
||||
>> ikiwiki directly from rcs_commit? (I didn't try yet.) On that note,
|
||||
>> I don't see any way for ikiwiki to generate a single file, but I guess
|
||||
>> that doesn't matter as --refresh should be fast enough.
|
||||
>> I made a Rcs/rcs.pm plugin from Stub. I have been testing it some.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> --JeremyReed
|
||||
|
||||
>> I made a working rcs plugin. And I made a RCS-to-web CGI. Details
|
||||
>> at [[patchqueue/rcs_(third-party_plugin)]]
|
||||
>> --[[JeremyReed]]
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> (Moved to patchqueue --[[Joey]])
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
# Using with CVS?
|
||||
|
||||
Any examples of using ikiwiki with cvs?
|
||||
|
@ -246,7 +184,7 @@ Any setting for limiting how many kilobytes can be submitted via the "edit" form
|
|||
|
||||
# Disable sub-discussion pages?
|
||||
|
||||
> Moved to [[bugs]] -- [[Joey]]
|
||||
Moved to [[bugs]] -- [[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|||
How about adding ACL? So that you can control which users are allowed
|
||||
to read, write certain pages. The moinmoin wiki has that, and it is
|
||||
something, that I think is very valuable.
|
||||
|
||||
> ikiwiki currently has only the most rudimentary access controls: pages
|
||||
> can be locked, or unlocked and only the admin can edit locked pages. That
|
||||
> could certianly be expanded on, although it's not an area that I have an
|
||||
> overwhelming desire to work on myself right now. Patches appreciated and
|
||||
> I'll be happy to point you in the right directions.. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> I'm really curious how you'd suggest implementing ACLs on reading a page.
|
||||
>> It seems to me the only way you could do it is .htaccess DenyAll or something,
|
||||
>> and then route all page views through ikiwiki.cgi. Am I missing something?
|
||||
>> --[[Ethan]]
|
||||
|
||||
>>> Or you could just use apache or whatever and set up the access controls
|
||||
>>> there. Of course, that wouldn't integrate very well with the wiki,
|
||||
>>> unless perhaps you decided to use http basic authentication and the
|
||||
>>> httpauth plugin for ikiwiki that integrates with that.. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>>>> Which would rule out openid, or other fun forms of auth. And routing all access
|
||||
>>>> through the CGI sort of defeats the purpose of ikiwiki. --[[Ethan]]
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|||
Any way to use `inline` but point the feed links to a different feed on the
|
||||
same site? I have news in news/*, a news archive in news.mdwn, and the
|
||||
first few news items on index.mdwn, but I don't really want two separate
|
||||
feeds, one with all news and one with the latest few articles; I'd rather
|
||||
point the RSS feed links of both to the same feed. (Which one, the one
|
||||
with all news or the one with the latest news only, I don't know yet.)
|
||||
|
||||
> Not currently. It could be implemented, or you could just turn off the
|
||||
> rss feed for the index page, and manually put in a wikilink to the news
|
||||
> page and rss feed. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> That wouldn't use the same style for the RSS and Atom links, and it
|
||||
>> wouldn't embed the feed link into `<head>` so that browsers can automatically
|
||||
>> find it.
|
|
@ -2,18 +2,19 @@
|
|||
seems like it could be beneficial to have it rendered in the post-commit
|
||||
hook, just like everything else in the wiki.
|
||||
|
||||
I hope to statically generate it eventually, currently the problem is
|
||||
that it takes at least several seconds to generate the recentchanges
|
||||
page, and adding several seconds to every page edit is not desiriable. If
|
||||
the time can be reduced it could be done, I'm also not adverse to
|
||||
adding an optional way to statically render it even at the current speed.
|
||||
> I hope to statically generate it eventually, currently the problem is
|
||||
> that it takes at least several seconds to generate the recentchanges
|
||||
> page, and adding several seconds to every page edit is not desiriable. If
|
||||
> the time can be reduced it could be done, I'm also not adverse to
|
||||
> adding an optional way to statically render it even at the current
|
||||
> speed. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
* Also, is it planned/desired that recent changes generate the same
|
||||
information in RSS feed format? This seems like it could be a useful way
|
||||
to keep track of the wiki as a whole.
|
||||
|
||||
This is used by various interwiki type things, I think, so should be
|
||||
done..
|
||||
> This is used by various interwiki type things, I think, so should be
|
||||
> done.. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
* Lastly, would it be possible to use the recent changes code with a
|
||||
pagespec? I understand this sort of infringes on territory covered by the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue