master
Joey Hess 2008-10-15 19:32:39 -04:00
parent 62201f83ed
commit 020eb6f294
1 changed files with 12 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ My first reading (and second and third) of this was that backlinks would be disa
> improve the documentation for this. [[done]] --[[Joey]]
I notice that there is quite a bit of redundancy when both tags and backlinks are used extensively. On most pages, the set of links features in both categories is almost identical because a tag's index page is shown both as a tag link and as a backlink. Is there a way to improve that situation somehow? I realise that backlinks aren't generated when the tag index page refers to its contents by \[\[!map ...]], etc., but sometimes an auto-generated index is insufficient.
I notice that there is quite a bit of redundancy when both tags and
backlinks are used extensively. On most pages, the set of links features in
both categories is almost identical because a tag's index page is shown
both as a tag link and as a backlink. Is there a way to improve that
situation somehow? I realise that backlinks aren't generated when the tag
index page refers to its contents by \[\[!map ...]], etc., but sometimes an
auto-generated index is insufficient.
--Peter
> Um, if you're manually linking from the tag's page to each page so
> tagged, I think you have larger problems than tags and backlinks being
> the same. Like keeping that list of links up to date as tags are added
> and changed. --[[Joey]]