2014-03-03 13:18:00 +01:00
|
|
|
[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/document-success-reason author="[[smcv]]"
|
|
|
|
browse=http://git.pseudorandom.co.uk/smcv/ikiwiki.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ready/document-success-reason]]
|
2014-07-04 11:40:29 +02:00
|
|
|
[[!tag patch users/smcv/ready]]
|
2014-03-03 13:18:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever I look at dependency calculation, for instance to solve
|
|
|
|
[[bugs/editing gitbranch template is really slow]], it takes me a while to
|
|
|
|
get my head round the concept of influences. The design documentation is
|
|
|
|
in [[todo/dependency_types]], but that takes the form of a long discussion
|
|
|
|
between [[Joey]] and [[Will]], so it's difficult to tell which of the
|
|
|
|
attempts to define influences were incorrect or have been superseded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it would be valuable to have brief documentation
|
|
|
|
as doc-comments in the source code. My branch adds some;
|
|
|
|
please confirm whether I got it right? :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would also be great to have a definition of what
|
|
|
|
should or shouldn't be counted as an influence, and which influences
|
|
|
|
should count as static or dynamic, perhaps analogous to
|
|
|
|
[git-annex's design pages](http://git-annex.branchable.com/design/)
|
|
|
|
and linked from the `match_foo` section of [[plugins/write]]. I haven't
|
|
|
|
written this myself because I'm somewhat stuck on the subtlety of what
|
|
|
|
"indirectly influenced" means... --[[smcv]]
|
2014-07-05 17:52:25 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>> the documentation looks correct to me, as far as i understand dependencies.
|
|
|
|
>> the documentation on `influences_static` could add a "Static influences are
|
|
|
|
>> what make `pagespec_match_list` more efficient than repeated
|
|
|
|
>> `pagespec_match_list`." to give an idea of why it is there in the first
|
|
|
|
>> place. --[[chrysn]]
|
2014-09-16 23:31:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> [[done]] in 3.20140916 --s
|