2008-02-14 21:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
It looks like all links in websites are absolute paths, this has some limitations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If connecting to website via https://... all links will take you back to http://
|
|
|
|
* Makes it harder to mirror website via HTML version, as all links have to be updated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be good if relative paths could be used instead, so the transport method isn't changed unless specifically requested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian May
|
2008-02-14 21:46:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Er, which absolute links are you talking about? If you view the source
|
|
|
|
> to this page, you'll find links such as "../favicon.ico", "../style.css",
|
|
|
|
> "../../", and "../". The only absolute links are to CGIs and the w3c DTD.
|
|
|
|
> --[[Joey]]
|