2007-02-12 08:56:33 +01:00
|
|
|
Changing pagespecs to be relative by default is quite feasible now, but it will cause
|
|
|
|
|
backwards compatibility problems. Should this be marked as a future plan, perhaps at a
|
2007-02-15 22:37:07 +01:00
|
|
|
major version number like 2.0? --Ethan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'm looking at making this kind of change at 2.0, added to the list.
|
|
|
|
|
However, I have doubts that it makes good sense to go relative by default.
|
|
|
|
|
While it's not consitent with links, it seems to work better overall to
|
|
|
|
|
have pagespecs be absolute by default, IMHO. --[[Joey]]
|
