2018-01-07 01:39:21 +01:00
|
|
|
Python 2 is officially unsupported after 2020, which is before the expected end-of-life
|
|
|
|
date of the next round of long-term-stable distributions like Debian 10 and Ubuntu 18.04,
|
|
|
|
so those distributions are encouraging all software that can migrate to Python 3 to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The down side of this is that it would make it harder to use the `rst` plugin on
|
|
|
|
very old OS releases, or on OSs where Python 3 is available but doesn't have a `python3`
|
|
|
|
symbolic link (if such OSs exist - [PEP 394](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/)
|
|
|
|
says they shouldn't), or in shared hosting environments where Python 2 is installed but
|
|
|
|
Python 3 isn't. (Mitigation: switching it to `python` or `python2` is a 1-line change.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For today's upload to Debian, I switched the `#!` line in the [[plugins/rst]] plugin
|
|
|
|
to `#!/usr/bin/python3`. In upstream ikiwiki it would probably be more appropriate
|
|
|
|
to use `#!/usr/bin/env python3`, and it would certainly be more appropriate to do it
|
|
|
|
by changing the source rather than by using `sed` after installation. I didn't apply that
|
|
|
|
change upstream immediately to give other maintainers a chance to comment. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--[[smcv]]
|
2018-01-08 14:15:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I can attest as a pkgsrc developer, where we try to build and package
|
|
|
|
> software on all sorts of platforms (some old and wacky), that as long
|
|
|
|
> as the relevant Pythons build on those platforms (and we tend to make
|
|
|
|
> sure they do), I don't foresee any negative impact of your suggested
|
|
|
|
> change to ikiwiki. Can't attest for other situations, but am generally
|
|
|
|
> biased toward biting future bullets as early as possible.
|
|
|
|
> --[[schmonz]]
|
2018-02-28 11:18:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>> Nobody objected, so it's now python3 for the next release. [[done]] --[[smcv]]
|