2009-02-14 13:19:32 +01:00
|
|
|
Hi!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How about to replace sparkline-php from Suggests by a better alternative?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to file a RM bug to get it out of archive. Do you have a better alternative for it? PHP has a lot of them..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
2009-02-15 23:48:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> sparline-php is orphaned *in Debian*. Upstream, is has seen activity as
|
|
|
|
|
> recently as 11 months ago.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> I don't know of a better alternative. I looked at the perl sparkline
|
|
|
|
|
> stuff in CPAN and is was bad enough that the pain of using php from this
|
|
|
|
|
> perl program was a better alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Anyway, it works great; maintaining the sparkline-php package in Debian
|
|
|
|
|
> would certianly be much less work than finding some alternative and
|
|
|
|
|
> rewriting the ikiwiki code to use it, *and* packaging that alternative
|
|
|
|
|
> and maintaining it in Debian. So your suggestion doesn't make a lot of
|
|
|
|
|
> sense; Debian should just find a maintainer for sparkline-php. --[[Joey]]
|
2010-06-09 21:11:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[done]]
|
