2008-11-13 04:32:02 +01:00
|
|
|
As documented in [[plugins/write]], the current `renamepage` hook is
|
|
|
|
heavily oriented towards updating links in pages' content: it is run
|
|
|
|
once per page linking to the renamed page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's fine, but it can't be used to trigger more general actions on
|
|
|
|
page rename. E.g. it won't be run at all if the page being renamed is
|
|
|
|
an orphan one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a real issue for the [[plugins/contrib/po]] development: what
|
|
|
|
I'm about to achieve is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- when a master page is renamed, the plugin takes notice of it (using
|
|
|
|
the `rename` hook), and later renames the translation pages
|
|
|
|
accordingly (in the `change` hook)
|
|
|
|
- when a master page is deleted, the plugin deletes its translations
|
|
|
|
(using the `delete` hook)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the current `renamepage` hook behavior, combining these two goals
|
|
|
|
has an annoying drawback: a plugin can't notice an orphan master page
|
|
|
|
has been renamed, so instead of renaming (and preserving) its
|
|
|
|
translations, it considers the oldpage as deleted, and deletes its
|
|
|
|
translations. Game over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may seem like a corner case, but I want to be very careful when
|
|
|
|
deleting files automatically in `srcdir`, which is not always under
|
|
|
|
version control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an sad workaround, I can still disable any deletion in `srcdir`
|
|
|
|
when it is not under version control. But I think ikiwiki deserves
|
|
|
|
a global `renamepage` hook that would be run once per rename
|
|
|
|
operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My proposal is thus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- keep the documented `renamepage` hook as it is
|
|
|
|
- use something inspired by the trick `preprocess` uses: when `hook`
|
|
|
|
is passed an optional "global" parameter, set to a true value, the
|
|
|
|
declared `renamepage` hook is run once per rename operation, and is
|
|
|
|
passed named parameters: `src`, `srcfile`, `dest` and `destfile`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm of course volunteering to implement this, or anything related that
|
|
|
|
would solve my problem. Hmmm? --[[intrigeri]]
|
2008-11-17 20:36:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I think it would be better to have a different hook that is called for
|
|
|
|
> renames, since the two hook actions are very different (unlike the
|
|
|
|
> preprocess hook, which does a very similar thing in scan mode).
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> Just calling it `rename` seems like a reasonable name, by analogy with
|
|
|
|
> the `delete` and `change` hooks.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> It might make sense to rename `renamepage` to `renamelink` to make it
|
|
|
|
> clearer what it does. (I'm not very worried about this breaking things, at
|
|
|
|
> this point.) --[[Joey]]
|