2009-05-05 10:41:15 +02:00
|
|
|
The [[blogspam plugin|plugins/blogspam]] is just great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, it lacks support in the web interface to [train comments as
|
|
|
|
SPAM](http://blogspam.net/api/classifyComment.html), when they were
|
|
|
|
erroneously identified as ham. It would be great to have such
|
|
|
|
support, also in the spirit of helping
|
|
|
|
[blogspam.net](http://blogspam.net) to get better and better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What would consist the most appropriate user interface is not entirely
|
|
|
|
clear to me in the general case (wiki page editing). The case of blog
|
|
|
|
comments look easier to: when the admin user is logged in (and if the
|
|
|
|
blogspam plugin is enabled), each comment can have an extra link "mark
|
|
|
|
as SPAM" which would both delete/revert the comment and submit it to
|
|
|
|
the configured blogspam server for training.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-06 12:11:53 +02:00
|
|
|
> Comments can't have an extra link when the admin user is logged
|
|
|
|
> in, because the admin user sees the same static pages as everyone
|
|
|
|
> else (non-admins still see the "remove" link provided by the remove
|
|
|
|
> plugin, too). Perhaps a better UI would be that the action of that
|
|
|
|
> link was overridden by the blogspam plugin to go to a form with
|
|
|
|
> a checkbox for "also submit as spam"? --[[smcv]]
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-05 10:41:15 +02:00
|
|
|
Similarly, ham training can be plugged directly into the current
|
|
|
|
comment moderation interface. Each comment that gets approved by the
|
|
|
|
admin, can be sent to blogspam.net as ham. If this is considered too
|
|
|
|
"aggressive", this behaviour can need to be explicitly enabled by
|
|
|
|
turning on a configuration option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- [[Zack]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[!tag wishlist]]
|