2012-04-08 22:19:46 +02:00
|
|
|
Wishlist items such as [[Add space before slash in parent links]] would be
|
|
|
|
|
easier to deal with if the page.tmpl template was broken up into sections
|
|
|
|
|
and each section had a separate template file which was included in the
|
|
|
|
|
master page.tmpl file. This would make it easier to customize parts of a
|
|
|
|
|
page without having to fork the whole page.tmpl and then have things break
|
|
|
|
|
when there's an update of the master page.tmpl file.
|
2012-04-03 07:56:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested sections:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* page_head.tmpl for the things in the <head> section
|
|
|
|
|
* page_header.tmpl for things in the "header" div (which includes the PARENTLINKS loop)
|
|
|
|
|
* page_actions.tmpl for the actions section
|
|
|
|
|
* page_sidebar.tmpl for the sidebar
|
|
|
|
|
* page_content.tmpl for the main content
|
|
|
|
|
* page_footer.tmpl for the footer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would this work, or would HTML::Template have problems with this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- [[KathrynAndersen]]
|
2012-04-08 22:19:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Well, breaking it up into 6 sections would let a user modify one of them
|
|
|
|
|
> with only 1/6th the chance of it being broken by a new ikiwiki.
|
|
|
|
|
> Which seems like a win from the user's POV. However, I know that there
|
|
|
|
|
> are ikiwiki users who modify the `page.tmpl` but are very
|
|
|
|
|
> unsophisticated; needing to find the right file amoung 6 to modify
|
|
|
|
|
> would be a loss for these users. And some modifications would probably
|
|
|
|
|
> need to be coordinated amoung multiple files.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> For ikiwiki developers, reducing by 5/6th the number of users affected by a
|
|
|
|
|
> breaking change to page.tmpl is nice, but we still have to worry about
|
|
|
|
|
> the 1 in 6 that would be affected despite the splitting. Ikiwiki has
|
|
|
|
|
> enough users that any change to page.tmpl has to be carefully considered
|
|
|
|
|
> to avoid breaking something they may depend on, and it's been two years
|
|
|
|
|
> since that last needed to be done.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> So all in all, I don't think it's worth doing. --[[Joey]]
|
