stress_at_work_analysis/exploration/expl_esm.py

266 lines
7.3 KiB
Python

# ---
# jupyter:
# jupytext:
# formats: ipynb,py:percent
# text_representation:
# extension: .py
# format_name: percent
# format_version: '1.3'
# jupytext_version: 1.11.2
# kernelspec:
# display_name: straw2analysis
# language: python
# name: straw2analysis
# ---
# %%
import os
import sys
import seaborn as sns
nb_dir = os.path.split(os.getcwd())[0]
if nb_dir not in sys.path:
sys.path.append(nb_dir)
import participants.query_db
from features.esm import *
# %% [markdown]
# # ESM data
# %% [markdown]
# Only take data from the main part of the study. The pilot data have different structure, there were especially many additions to ESM_JSON.
# %%
participants_inactive_usernames = participants.query_db.get_usernames(
collection_start=datetime.date.fromisoformat("2020-08-01")
)
df_esm_inactive = get_esm_data(participants_inactive_usernames)
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed = preprocess_esm(df_esm_inactive)
df_esm_preprocessed.head()
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed.columns
# %% [markdown]
# # Concordance
# %% [markdown]
# The purpose of concordance is to count the number of EMA sessions that a participant answered in a day and possibly compare it to some maximum number of EMAs that could theoretically be presented for that day.
# Traditionally, concordance (adherence) in EMA study is simply calculated as the ratio of (daily) answered EMAs.
# This is possible for studies with simple EMA design, such that they are presented at fixed schedule and expired within a certain limit.
#
# Since EMAs were triggered more flexibly in our study, a different approach is needed.
# %% [markdown]
# ## Session IDs
# %% [markdown]
# One approach would be to count distinct session IDs which are incremented for each group of EMAs. However, since not every question answered counts as a fulfilled EMA, some unique session IDs should be eliminated first.
# %%
session_counts = df_esm_preprocessed.groupby(["participant_id", "esm_session"]).count()[
"id"
]
# %% [markdown]
# Group data by participant_id and esm_session and count the number of instances (by id). Session counts are therefore counts of how many times a specific session ID appears *within* a specific participant.
#
# In the plot below, it is impossible to distinguish whether a specific count appears many times within the same or across different participants.
# %%
sns.displot(session_counts.to_numpy(), binwidth=1, height=8)
# %% [markdown]
# ### Unique session IDs
# %%
df_session_counts = pd.DataFrame(session_counts).rename(
columns={"id": "esm_session_count"}
)
df_session_1 = df_session_counts[(df_session_counts["esm_session_count"] == 1)]
df_esm_unique_session = df_session_1.join(
df_esm_preprocessed.set_index(["participant_id", "esm_session"])
)
# %%
df_esm_unique_session["esm_user_answer"].value_counts()
# %% [markdown]
# The "DayFinished3421" tag marks the last EMA, where the participant only marked "I finished with work for today" and did not answer any questions.
# What do the answers "Ne" represent?
# %%
df_esm_unique_session.query("esm_user_answer == 'Ne'")[
["esm_trigger", "esm_instructions", "esm_user_answer"]
].head()
# %%
df_esm_unique_session.loc[
df_esm_unique_session["esm_user_answer"].str.contains("Ne"), "esm_trigger"
].value_counts()
# %% [markdown]
# These are all "first" questions of EMAs which serve as a way to postpone the daytime or evening EMAs.
# %% [markdown]
# The other answers signify expired or interrupted EMAs.
# %% [markdown]
# ### "Almost" unique session IDs
# %% [markdown]
# There are some session IDs that only appear twice or three times.
# %%
df_session_counts[
(df_session_counts["esm_session_count"] < 4)
& (df_session_counts["esm_session_count"] > 1)
]
# %% [markdown]
# Some represent the morning EMAs that only contained three questions.
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed.query("participant_id == 89 & esm_session == 158")[
["esm_trigger", "esm_instructions", "esm_user_answer"]
]
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed.query("participant_id == 89 & esm_session == 157")[
["esm_trigger", "esm_instructions", "esm_user_answer"]
]
# %% [markdown]
# Others represent interrupted EMA sessions.
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed.query("participant_id == 31 & esm_session == 77")[
["esm_trigger", "esm_instructions", "esm_user_answer"]
]
# %% [markdown]
# ### Long sessions
# %%
df_session_counts[(df_session_counts["esm_session_count"] > 40)]
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed.query("participant_id == 83").sort_values("_id")[
["esm_trigger", "datetime_lj", "_id", "username", "device_id"]
]
# %% [markdown]
# Both, session ID and \_ID (and others) reset on application reinstall. Here, it can be seen that the application was reinstalled on 2 April (actually, the phone was replaced as reported by the participant).
#
# Session IDs should therefore be grouped while taking the device ID into account.
# %%
session_counts_device = df_esm_preprocessed.groupby(
["participant_id", "device_id", "esm_session"]
).count()["id"]
sns.displot(session_counts_device.to_numpy(), binwidth=1, height=8)
# %% [markdown]
# ## Other possibilities
# %% [markdown]
# Prepare a dataframe with session response as determined from other indices.
# %%
import numpy as np
df_session_counts = pd.DataFrame(session_counts_device).rename(
columns={"id": "esm_session_count"}
)
df_session_counts["session_response"] = np.NaN
session_group_by = df_esm_preprocessed.groupby(
["participant_id", "device_id", "esm_session"]
)
df_session_counts.count()
# %% [markdown]
# ### ESM statuses
# %% [markdown]
# The status of the ESM can be: 0-new, 1-dismissed, 2-answered, 3-expired, 4-visible, or 5-branched.
#
# Which statuses appear in the data?
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed["esm_status"].value_counts()
# %% [markdown]
# Most of the ESMs were answered (2). We can group all others as unanswered.
# %%
contains_status_not_2 = session_group_by.apply(lambda x: (x.esm_status != 2).any())
df_session_counts.loc[contains_status_not_2, "session_response"] = "esm_unanswered"
# %%
df_session_counts.count()
# %% [markdown]
# ### Day finished or off
# %%
non_session = session_group_by.apply(
lambda x: (
(x.esm_user_answer == "DayFinished3421") | (x.esm_user_answer == "DayOff3421")
).any()
)
df_session_counts.loc[non_session, "session_response"] = "day_finished"
# %%
df_session_counts.count()
# %% [markdown]
# ### Removed
# %% [markdown]
# There are also answers that explicitly describe what happened to a pending question that start with "Removed%".
# %%
esm_removed = session_group_by.apply(
lambda x: (x.esm_user_answer.str.contains("Removed")).any()
)
# %%
df_session_counts.loc[esm_removed]
# %%
df_session_counts.loc[esm_removed, "session_response"].value_counts()
# %% [markdown]
# It turns out that these had been accounted for with ESM statuses.
# %% [markdown]
# ### Evening_last
# %% [markdown]
# When the evening EMA session comes to an end, the trigger should reflect this, that is, it should say `evening_last`.
# %%
finished_sessions = session_group_by.apply(
lambda x: (x.esm_trigger.str.endswith("_last")).any()
)
df_session_counts.loc[finished_sessions, "session_response"] = "esm_finished"
# %%
df_session_counts.count()
# %%
df_esm_preprocessed["esm_trigger"].value_counts()
# %%
sns.displot(
df_session_counts[df_session_counts.session_response.isna()],
x="esm_session_count",
binwidth=1,
height=8,
)
# %%