Explain traditional concordance approach.
parent
2da9a8f9e3
commit
06c179f4dd
|
@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ df_esm_preprocessed.columns
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# %% [markdown]
|
# %% [markdown]
|
||||||
# The purpose of concordance is to count the number of EMA sessions that a participant answered in a day and possibly compare it to some maximum number of EMAs that could theoretically be presented for that day.
|
# The purpose of concordance is to count the number of EMA sessions that a participant answered in a day and possibly compare it to some maximum number of EMAs that could theoretically be presented for that day.
|
||||||
|
# Traditionally, concordance (adherence) in EMA study is simply calculated as the ratio of (daily) answered EMAs.
|
||||||
|
# This is possible for studies with simple EMA design, such that they are presented at fixed schedule and expired within a certain limit.
|
||||||
|
#
|
||||||
|
# Since EMAs were triggered more flexibly in our study, a different approach is needed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# %% [markdown]
|
# %% [markdown]
|
||||||
# ## Session IDs
|
# ## Session IDs
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue